Providing Market Intelligence for 40 Years

In The News

Smart-home tech might help older adults live independently longer

A recent survey by the research firm Parks Associates of adults age 40 and over found that 80 percent expected to still be living in their own homes when they were 80 years old.

That expectation, however, is contingent on maintaining the financial means and the physical abilities to continue to live independently. While smart-home technology can’t help boost financial security, it could help seniors with health and safety concerns.

While seniors want more than the socially stigmatizing “I’ve fallen and I can’t get up” alert pendants that have been around since the 1980s, some smart-home technologies currently available are still too complicated to set up and operate, said Brad Russell, Parks Associates senior research analyst.

From the article "Smart-home tech might help older adults live independently longer" by Benny Evangelista.

Previously In The News

Good Wi-Fi key to platform choice and reducing churn: Report

The in-home Wi-Fi experience is increasingly the deciding factor between platforms capable of delivering broadband to consumers, according to a new report published by Parks Associates and TechSee....

Broadpeak launches Multiview solution to simplify multi-stream live sports viewing

Parks Associates’ S.O.S State of Streaming 2026 report found that multiview is one of the most appealing interactive features for sports viewers, popular among 53% of fans alongside critical capabilit...

Biometric Smart Locks: Are Physical Keys Going Extinct?

According to a 2025 market assessment by Parks Associates, owners typically use a smart lock’s fingerprint sensor more frequently than other access methods — 73% of users report using the feature dail...

Eufy Fingerprint Smart Lock Gets 35% Price Cut

Smart locks are no longer niche. Parks Associates reports that more than one in ten US broadband households now owns a smart door lock, and adoption continues to climb as devices integrate better with...