Parks Points

Is Streaming Disrupting the Pay-TV Industry?

by Barbara Kraus | Jun. 15, 2016

The evolution of content distribution and the consistent growth of over-the-top (OTT) streaming generate industry predictions of the inevitable decline and fall of pay TV. As video ecosystems collide, the industry remains in a state of great change.

While streaming continues to grow, the number of pay-TV subscriptions in the U.S. is expected to remain relatively stable and to continue to grow elsewhere in the world. While media coverage focuses on cord cutting, the impact has been minimal thus far. Total pay-TV subscriptions in the U.S. are expected to decline by 0.3% between 2015 and 2019. To some extent, the actual number of subscriptions will be propped up by increases in the number of pay-TV households, although the actual penetration is expected to decline from 83% in 2015 to 80% in 2019.

Several issues influence the impact of streaming on pay TV. The key is to try to identify the tipping point -- that point at which consumers believe OTT streaming better fits their needs than does a pay-TV subscription. There are three potential tipping points.

Live TV

Consumer adoption of live TV streaming is good for connected devices, as it will increase usage on those devices. Assuming streaming services have sufficient content available, device makers have the opportunity to provide a holistic content access experience.

Consumers like live TV and sports. At this point, however, most continue to need a pay-TV subscription to watch their local teams. Currently, live TV offerings from streaming providers have some limitations. For example, Dish Networks' Sling TV offers live TV, but has experienced major outages, does not allow for pausing or fast-forwarding during commercials on many channels, and has limited channels for viewing.

When streamed live TV is as reliable as cable, fiber, or satellite, it will be a more disruptive competitor. Streaming services will be more disruptive with affordably priced ad hoc programming. Both the technical issues and content licensing will take time, so while more households will adopt streaming live TV, the adoption trend will be gradual.

Content availability

New companies entering the streaming market have hit roadblocks in acquiring content rights. An anticipated 2015 launch by Apple was postponed until 2016 due to slower-than-expected negotiations with content providers. Both Intel and Microsoft made moves to create online streaming services only to pull the plug due to content rights issues.

By virtue of their long-term partnerships that reach footprints with millions of subscribers, traditional pay-TV providers continue to hold the cards in negotiations with content providers. In terms of raw numbers, no streaming devices compete with traditional providers at this time; the number of device categories and brands create a fragmented market.

While content providers are willing to work with streaming services, bundles of channels -- rather than ad hoc channels -- may be required, similar to packages provided by traditional pay-TV providers. Streaming services will not necessarily be able to get the same pricing. Content licensing negotiations are protracted and the content developer owns the cards. However, streaming channels, such as CBS All Access, show great potential for connected devices. With CBS All Access priced at $5.99 per month, the question is how many channels a household will be able to subscribe to on an ad hoc basis -- before the monthly prices meet or exceed that of a cable package. 

Read the rest of this article on FierceOnlineVideo

Related Research:




Barbara Kraus

Barbara Kraus

Director of Research

Barbara Kraus joined Parks Associates in early 2013 and currently studies the connected consumer electronics field. Barbara’s expertise is delivering and monetizing consumer insights through the provision of compelling product and service technologies and experiences.

Barbara’s background includes more than 10 years with technology service providers in the telecom and home security industries in marketing, strategy and insights, operations, and business development. She also worked for EDS, now HP Enterprise Services, in market intelligence and large-deal sales support. Barbara received her bachelor’s degree in liberal arts from the University of Kansas and MBA from WSU.

Industry Expertise: Consumer Electronics, Connected Home Entertainment Devices, CE Consumer Adoption and Usage Patterns, Security and Privacy, Cloud Platforms and Applications, International Research

© 1998-2018 Parks Associates. All Rights Reserved.